I'm wrong. A lot.
It's a fairly common occurrence , especially if you ask my wife. Not, just here at drinkdrank, either—all the time, everyday—at the grocery store, picking-up the kids, you name it, chances are I'm wrong.
In my own defense, though, I don't have a fact checker working for me, like a major men's magazine might. A men's magazine like, say, GQ. So, when I read something like this:
A little background on this might help a bit. It comes from William Bostwick and was written for GQ's Beer School column. The good mister Bostwick is expounding the virtue of pilsner—specifically Firestone Walker's new offering, Pivo. That's great, I'm sure it's fantastic, most FW stuff is. It's just that he seems to have taken some liberties with the history. Aside from stating that Pilsner was born in the 'late' 19th-century (Pilsner's birthday is October 5, 1842—not so 'late'), and that brewing in that century was 'a rough art' (British breweries produced million and millions of barrels of beer during the 19th-century, so maybe not that 'rough'), the author later asserts that Pilsner was invented because British brewers began light-toasting their malt, and then Continental brewers began making something imitating IPA and Bitter. The Brits may have influenced Bohemain malting techniques, but I don't think I'd go as far as to say Pilsner was invented to imitate IPA.
The author has also submitted, for our disapproval, a link to his own website, showing a 19th-century/early 20th-century, anti-temperance ad which states 'Against Prohibition - Lager’s amber fluid mild, gives health and strength to wife and child.' That would be fine if there was some mention of Pilsner, not simply, generic amber lager—which Pilsner is not. 19th-century American Amber Lager would be more akin to Yeungling than Pilsner Urquell.
A lot—not all, though—of this confusion, could have been easily cleared up if he would have just added the words 'Bohemia' or 'Bavaria', or just simply 'German', occasionally... Pilsner was born into dark days for German beer... Bavarian brewing was still a rough art and beers were, on the whole brown, smoky and thick... Many German breweries were technologically behind the Belgians and Brits—and Prussians for that matter—but that's an important thing to include. Otherwise the reader assumes that all 19th-century brewing was pre-industrial, for lack of a better term.
There's one other issue.
Bostwick is seeming to imply that Firestone Walker Pivo is the first 'craft' Pilsner. Samuel Adams Nobel Pils, North Coast Scrimshaw, Sierra Nevada Summerfest and the Crisp from Sixpoint, might not agree.
So, am I wrong?
In my own defense, though, I don't have a fact checker working for me, like a major men's magazine might. A men's magazine like, say, GQ. So, when I read something like this:
I say to myself, okay, that seems...off.Pilsner was born into dark days for beer. In the late nineteenth century, brewing was still a rough art and beers were, on the whole brown, smoky, and thick as curdled milk—gut-busting liquid bread, hearty fuel in an age when breakfast for most was a bowl of beer soup.
A little background on this might help a bit. It comes from William Bostwick and was written for GQ's Beer School column. The good mister Bostwick is expounding the virtue of pilsner—specifically Firestone Walker's new offering, Pivo. That's great, I'm sure it's fantastic, most FW stuff is. It's just that he seems to have taken some liberties with the history. Aside from stating that Pilsner was born in the 'late' 19th-century (Pilsner's birthday is October 5, 1842—not so 'late'), and that brewing in that century was 'a rough art' (British breweries produced million and millions of barrels of beer during the 19th-century, so maybe not that 'rough'), the author later asserts that Pilsner was invented because British brewers began light-toasting their malt, and then Continental brewers began making something imitating IPA and Bitter. The Brits may have influenced Bohemain malting techniques, but I don't think I'd go as far as to say Pilsner was invented to imitate IPA.
The author has also submitted, for our disapproval, a link to his own website, showing a 19th-century/early 20th-century, anti-temperance ad which states 'Against Prohibition - Lager’s amber fluid mild, gives health and strength to wife and child.' That would be fine if there was some mention of Pilsner, not simply, generic amber lager—which Pilsner is not. 19th-century American Amber Lager would be more akin to Yeungling than Pilsner Urquell.
A lot—not all, though—of this confusion, could have been easily cleared up if he would have just added the words 'Bohemia' or 'Bavaria', or just simply 'German', occasionally... Pilsner was born into dark days for German beer... Bavarian brewing was still a rough art and beers were, on the whole brown, smoky and thick... Many German breweries were technologically behind the Belgians and Brits—and Prussians for that matter—but that's an important thing to include. Otherwise the reader assumes that all 19th-century brewing was pre-industrial, for lack of a better term.
There's one other issue.
Bostwick is seeming to imply that Firestone Walker Pivo is the first 'craft' Pilsner. Samuel Adams Nobel Pils, North Coast Scrimshaw, Sierra Nevada Summerfest and the Crisp from Sixpoint, might not agree.
So, am I wrong?